Tag Archives: Cameras

A lesson in travel photography (or “how I learned my lesson”)

Who doesn’t love to travel? I know I sure do! I, like a lot of travel lovers, do not get to do it as much as I would like to. Everyone likes to take photos when they travel. When a photographer goes on vacation, photography can become the most important thing. More important than experiences

Three years ago, I up and took a voyage to England. Alone. You can read a little about it here. Besides the fact that I was already in love with the Motherland before I set foot on British soil, I knew the main purpose of my trip was photography, photography, photography. I owned a dSLR, but I was so high and mighty that I didn’t take it. I documented my entire trip on film. There were times when camera malfunctions made me second-guess this decision, but I don’t regret leaving the digital camera back in Mississippi while I went to England. In the end, I was glad I’d gone to England on my own because when you are a photographer on vacay, it can be difficult to juggle your desire to photograph with being fair to your traveling companions. I could stop and go as much as I want, come and go as I pleased, all to suit my photographic needs.

Both the issue of film vs. digital and how to get in satisfying photography while traveling with others cropped up for me recently. I traveled with about 7 of my friends to St. Louis, Missouri for a quick visit. I, being me, left my nice digital SLR at home and opted instead to take my Nikon FE and Holga 120N. I didn’t stock up on film before I left for Missouri because I figured I could just do that when I got up there. When some of my friends realized I didn’t have my digital camera, they were both perplexed and slightly disappointed because they new the limitations of film might hamper the volume of photos I could take on the trip. I was somewhat offended that my artistic vision for documenting our time in St. Louis was being questioned. Then some things happened along the way that caused me to learn my lesson.

I am very stubborn about using film rather than digital in most areas of my photography. However, I’m going to have to admit now there are some drawbacks to basing yourself in film photography. For example, when my friends and I arrived in St. Louis, it was getting late in the day and the sunlight was fading fast. We went to the zoo, and there were definitely certain shots I couldn’t get because I had a slow film speed, 100 ASA, loaded in my camera. Sure, I am quite pleased with some of the photos I DID get, but the scope of my photography that first night in the STL was not what it should’ve been.

Nikon FE and Holga 120N at the St. Louis Zoo. 

Tragedy struck my plan of being too cool for school and do only film photography in St. Louis: I actually LEFT my wallet at the restaurant where we’d stopped for lunch on our way to St. Louis. Cape Girardeau, Missouri. I discovered this when I went to stock up on film and had no way of paying for it. D’oh! My lack of preparedness bit me in the rear. Yes, Amanda Raney did go out of town with only one roll of 35mm film in her possession. Oh how the mighty have fallen…

I ran out of film pretty early in the day Sunday morning. Before we’d even left our super cool hotel, in fact! And we still had hours of St. Louis awesomeness to enjoy before going home. What’s a girl to do??

Nikon FE and Holga 120N at and around the hotel Sunday morning

All was not lost, thanks to the darling Annie who decided I should use her point-and-shoot digital camera while we spent our last few hours in St. Louis before going back to Memphis. I’m sure she knew not being able to take photos like I wanted was just eating me up inside. If you think I’m uppity about not using my dSLR for everything, you should see how uppity I normally am about my ever having to use a point-and-shoot digital! Once again, I had to learn my lesson: some camera is better than no camera at all. And guess what: that little camera of Annie’s wasn’t half bad! It performed well, I’d say. We went to the St. Louis Art Museum, the galleria, and a cool pizza joint for lunch. I ended up being quite pleased with a lot of the photos. Just gotta know how to get the best out of these little cameras.

Further adventures in STL, taken with Annie’s Sony Cybershot 

For the events that unfolded with my photography in St. Louis, I am taking the “all’s well that ends well” viewpoint. I didn’t come back with a portfolio stacked with shots of that city, but I came back with a lot of fun (and some quite nice) shots that fulfilled my need to do photography while traveling.

So what is my conclusion in all of this? When you, as a photographer, are going somewhere special, you have to assess the purpose of your trip. Is this a trip that is going to be based mostly around photography? If so, how is this going to work out if I’m traveling with others who are not mainly interested in doing fine photography while we’re away? Even if I had had all the film in the world while I was in St. Louis, I wouldn’t have been able to do everything I wanted to photographically because I was with people whose purpose was to hang out with friends in a different city, not pack in as much photography as possible.

I had to learn that maybe it’s okay that I go out of town with my friends and have a main purpose of just being with my buddies. When I access the purpose of future out of town trips, I will decide if it’s to hang out with my friends, or if I’m planning on coming back with a body of work from that city. After my experience in St. Louis, if the answer is “my main purpose is to just have fun with my friends,” I’m honestly just going to throw my digital camera and maybe a small 35mm camera in my bag to take care of the type of photography I’ll do while I’m away.

It was my first time to travel to St. Louis and I just LOVED the city. I was just DYING because there were so many awesome things I saw and I wanted to capture in photos. It just wasn’t practical this time around. I resigned myself that I would be “forced” to go back to STL another time specifically for a photo excursion. Oh, the things I’ll do for my work!

The Epic Blog About Instant Photography

I love instant photography. As it happens, this is ‘Roid Week 2009. I haven’t figured out yet which powers of be so dubbed it, but it doesn’t matter to me if it was just some person on the internet somewhere. I love instant photography (which I have already so plainly stated.) It’s hard to say it’s ‘Roid Week when, truthfully, there’s not really a Polaroid anymore. Thank GOD though, instant photography lives on. Fuji makes a film that fits a lot of Polaroid pack film cameras (as well as cameras manufactured by other companies, such as Keystone, which will be discussed later. ) It’s a thing of beauty! And there is a movement to begin production of film for Polaroid cameras called The Impossible Project. Pretty cool, huh?

So, here’s the rub: ‘Roid Week is juuuuuuust about over, and I have yet to have the opportunity to take any of my instant film cameras out for a spin. The good folks at Memphis Photo Supply happened to be out of the Fuji instant film I generally use, but may have some for me just in time for the very last day of  ‘Roid week. They’re sweethearts, I tell ya. However, since ‘Roid Week is nearly up, and I haven’t been able to participate the way I would have liked, I decided to prepare for you folks The Epic Blog About Instant Photography. Wee! I know you’re excited.

I have been fortunate to have a number of Polaroid and other instant cameras at my disposal. If I weren’t such a poor photographer girl, I’d have been VERY fortunate and consequently have way more Polaroid pictures to show you. But I’ll give you a little  taste  of what I have to show from all the instant cameras I’ve had my paws on.

Instant cameras I have used throughout the years:

Cameras that use “integral” Polaroid film”
(the kind that you would be tempted to shake “like a Polaroid picture”, if Polaroid weren’t so concerned about the implications of such things. This film has all the processing chemicals contained within, unlike earlier Polaroid films.)

Polaroid One Step 600

I don’t know if this one really counts or not. My dad was working as a mechanic for a fleet of courier vans. He got this camera to take photos of the vans when they got into fender benders, for insurance purposes. I guess I didn’t get to use it much (please reference the aforementioned poorness of this photographer girl.) But I DO have this potentially embarrassing photo of my two younger brothers and a puppy that I took when we were teenagers. Are ya lovin it? Are my brothers going to hunt me down and make me pay for posting this on the internet? Possibly. Am I glad they don’t possess an equally embarrassing Polaroid of me circa 1996 to use for exacting their revenge? You bet!

Polaroid Joycam

I wish I remembered more about how I came into possession of this camera. It must’ve been about 2003 or so, as that’s when most of the photos I have from that were taken. Including the PRECIOUS one of my niece you see below this paragraph. It took a type of integral film called Polaroid 500. This wasn’t the best camera or most full-featured in the world, but I mean, it’s called Joycam and just look at it. It’s cool. Film wasn’t widely availble for the Joycam by the time I’d owned it a couple of years. Back in 2005 or so, I found a stockpile of expired 500 film at a flea market for about a buck a pack. I was pumped. Then apparently my brother and his wife mistakenly threw  out all the 500 film I’d stocked up, and I never got to use any of it ever again. Sad, but true, story.

Polaroid I-zone

What fun little cameras the I-zones were! I had about 3 different styles of I-zone cameras. One of them changed colors when you touched it. One of them had interchangeable face plates (purple and blue.) And one of them was the Barbie edition I-zone (my friend Annie gave it to me.) I liked to use the I-zone for pictures of my friends. They were wild over the I-zone pictures. Especially the ones that were on “fortune film.” The way fortune film worked was: when the photo first came out of the camera, while the photo was developing, a little message was displayed where the picture eventually showed up. The message disappeared once the picture developed, so I used to write down the fortune before it was gone. They said things like “Dance. Always dance.” and “He’s not out of your league.” And basically, fortune film never lied. Whatever it said usually fit the subject of the photo.

Look how teeny the pictures were!

Polaroid SX-70 Sonar

I should do a whole blog just on this camera. Ahhhhhh! My favorite Polaroid integral film camera! I have had, oh, THREE of these, all of which have been the auto focus version of the camera. “How does this camera focus automatically?”, you may ask. BY USING SONAR. That’s right. JUST LIKE RUSSIAN SUBMARINES! Things that make this camera amazing: not only is it an auto focus camera, but it’s an SLR.  That’s right. A POLAROID SLR. Not only is it an SLR, but it focuses WAY close. I think they say it focuses down to 10″ but I always feel like it goes closer than that (most Polaroid cameras don’t get closer than 3 feet, 2 feet at most.) AND DID I MENTION IT FOLDS [basically] FLAT WHEN YOU’RE NOT USING IT?! [see it in action]

The SX-70 was intended to take a film called Polaroid Time Zero. Some people dug this film because you could manipulate the picture if you messed with it during a certain timeframe after having taken the picture. I loved the photos it took just the way they were and didn’t do much manipulating (I’m not much of a manipulative person in general.) That film was still available widely back when I got one of these cameras. You could get it even at drug stores and the like. By 2006, Time Zero wasn’t around anymore. There were ways of using Polaroid’s (then) more readily avaible 600 film in the camera. It was no Time Zero film, I have to say, but I enjoyed a lot of shots I got with my SX-70 fitted with a neutral density filter and filled with 600 film. *sigh* If only I could get my hands on some 600 film now for the THIRD SX-70 I’ve just purchased (I couldn’t help it, ya’ll. I have such a soft spot in my heart for this camera. I just wanted another one, even if I never got any film for it and the most I could do with it was look at its pretty face.)

The first SX-70 I had, I found at a junk store/antique mall in 2003. I had seen SX-70s on the internet, but never in person. I saw it in the folded down posittion, and mistook it for a VHS tape momentarily. It was $10.  The second one I bought was from that same antique store and was also $10, but I sent it to a friend in England shortly thereafter. The one I kept looked like this before it was all said and done:

But it still took pictures like this:

Ah-cha-cha. That camera had moxie, I tell ya! (imagine I’m Jimmy Durante for that last line.)

Also, please watch this highly informative and strangely beautiful commercial for the SX-70.

Polaroid Spectra 1200si

Oooooh. I liked this one. I think it was a 2005 ebay purchase. I was not getting to use my SX-70 anymore, and this was as close to that camera as I was going to get at the time.  It, like the SX-70 was a Sonar auto focus camera (big plus!), though not an SLR like the SX-70. But it had a built-in flash, which was nice for snapshots or fill-flash. Unlike a lot of Polaroids though, you could turn the flash off and the camera would do long exposures (HUGE plus.) It took Polaroid Spectra film, which was pretty accessible at the time when I was using the camera. Funds for the film were not, however. I liked using the 1200si a lot, and would fire it up tomorrow if I had some film to put in it.

Polaroid Impulse AF

Ehm. I’m not sure why I bought this one. I bought it off ebay for around $5 in 2005, I suppose. It took the good ole Polaroid 600 film. The Impulse AF also had sonar auto focus, like the SX-70, but it seemed way less cool on this camera. I got some good shots with it, so I guess I got my $5 out of my Impulse AF. Maybe I’ll unearth Impulse one day if the Impossible Project works out.

Polaroid cameras that use “non-integral” film
(aka peel-apart film. The chemicals which process the picture are exposed when you pull it open to reveal the developed picture. It’s kinda messy and requires you to time how long you let the photo develop, depending on what the air temperature is when you are letting the photo develop.)

Polaroid 250

I am in L-O-V-E with the pictures I get out of this camera. The quality is top-notch and SEE HOW AWESOME THE CAMERA LOOKS?! There are a number of cameras of the same ilk as the 250, but the features of the 250 include a rangefinder focusing system, long as h*ll exposures when needed, and a nice glass lens.

Know what’s cool about these kinds of cameras? The pull-apart film comes in color:

AND black and white:

The 250 is one of the cameras which accepts the type of film Fuji currently produces for instant photography. This is killer, considering these Polaroid cameras that use peel-apart film are just about the only Polaroid cameras which are very useful since Polaroid quit producing film themselves.

Polaroid Colorpack

I don’t own a Polaroid Colorpack. I was able to borrow one from my friend Drew earlier this year (and here is a picture of Drew actually holding the camera.) It’s another sweet peel-apart film camera. I think the pictures even look sorta like they were made in the 70s when I used the Colorpack.  It’s got a plastic lens instead of glass, which probably adds to that vintage feel. Tres cool!

Non-Polaroid Instant Cameras:

Fuji Instax 200

This camera is pretty insane looking. I need to take a picture of it next to something normal sized so you can see how monstrous it is. I became sensitzed to the existence of the Instax camera because I saw a kid on the Canadian teen soap opera, Degrassi, using one. It was an instant camera, but wasn’t like any Polaroid I’d ever seen. My word! I got kinda obsessed with the idea of procuring an Instax, and even ended up getting a friend out of the deal. I posted  photography forums that I needed someone in the UK to help me find one of these cameras and send it to me, and someone volunteered to help with this task. We found one for under £4. Got me some film, too. This is another camera I liked to use but never got to use enough. At the time, the only way to get film for it was to order from the UK (which I did, and it was cost-prohibitive to have it shipped over here.)  Now, it seems like Instax film is available at most online camera supply stores. Maybe I will invest in some and take this baby for a spin. As far as limited-featured, point-and-shoot instant cameras go, I thought the quality was better than the Polaroid equivilant. The Instax’s appearance also had this cool factor that made my friends take notice when I whipped it out (although I couldn’t whip it out very quickly, since as I said, it’s monstrous.)

Keystone 800 Everflash

The Keystone is actually the most recent addition to my instant camera collection. I picked it up at the local camera shop. I saw it up on the shelf, asked one of the veteran photographers there was kind of camera it was, and ended up walking out having purchased the Keystone knowing only what the camera shop fellow told me about it. I can’t find much information about the Keystone online anywhere, nor can I find many photos on Flickr which were taken with the camera. However, I have quite enjoyed my Keystone. Like the Polaroid 250, I am able to use Fuji’s instant film in the Keystone. A cool feature on the Keystone, which other instant cameras produced at the time of the Keystone lacked, is the built-in flash. Most cameras back then used the dreaded flash cubes. Yuck! I don’t have much use for a flash on an instant camera, but it actually has come in handy so far. The camera does do long exposures when needed, something I always love in a camera that doesn’t let you set the exposure controls yourself. The Keystone has a plastic lens, but I’ve found it surprisingly sharp. Mmmm. I’m a fan of my Keystone, for sure.

Bonus: cheesy photo I took of my Keystone 800 at my portait studio job one day when I was bored.
(I know this blog was extremely long. I warned you in the beginning that it was gonna be epic though, so I applaud you if you stuck it out. Yay for instant photography! Check out more here in my galleries.)

My Affair with the Hassy

Dear Hasselblad 500 C/M,

I love you.

I hope you don’t mind this outpouring of affection from me, in such a public forum. But I just can’t contain my feelings for you any longer.

The day Dirk placed you in my hands, I was filled with such awe and wonder at your beauty. You’re a beast – and I mean that in the most complimentary way possible.

Though I knew I loved you at first sight, I wasn’t sure if things would work out between us. I felt that I was trying too hard – as new love often makes people do.  Gabe, who was very new to photography then, was seeming to have more success at wooing you than I was. Then, one day, I had you in my hands at the Volkswagen repair shop near my home, and you and I suddenly understood each other. I found my groove with you, and, I believe, you with me.  I grew to love the feeling of turning your film winding crank, to adore the THWACK of your shutter release. I felt one with you.

I took you nearly everywhere I went – when Gabe wasn’t having his alone time with you, that is (I had to overcome issues with jealously during these times.) Gabe I and made trips to places like downtown Memphis and Bolivar, Tennessee JUST to spend time with you. You were integrated into my everyday life, seeing what I saw and capturing the images of (and hearts of) those people nearest and dearest to me.

Then came the day when I walked back into Memphis Photo Supply – the site of our first meeting – and was informed that you had to go back to  the one with whom you belonged. Oh, the pain of separation. Shakespeare put it best when he said “Parting is such sweet sorrow.” But I suppose our relationship had run its course.

I don’t know if we’ll ever cross paths again, or if I’ll just find someone new who reminds me of you.

I’ll remember you, always, Hassy.

Love,
Amanda

Memories Hassy and I shared together…

(you may click on these thumbnails to view larger versions of the photos)

(to view the photos Gabe made with the Hasselblad 500 C/M, you may click here)

Post Navigation